Monthly Archive for January, 2005

Lazy minds are the devil’s playground

Enigma editor and publisher Dave Weinthal got busted today. He was caught plagiarizing in an article he wrote in November, 2004. I’ve never been a regular reader (I’m more of a Pulse kinda grrrl) but I’m still pretty damn disappointed. Maybe I’m hyper-aware of this issue (my spouse is an English professor), but I should think that anyone who’s been to college has learned that plagiarism doesn’t pay. You WILL get caught — especially in the age of Google, Lexis-Nexis, and amazon.com’s search inside the book. So why would a supposed professional be so reckless and/or stupid?

###

Idle hands are a muse’s playground

People are pretty much overbooked these days. Mayberry’s Andy Taylor no longer just hangs out on his porch in the evening, picking at his guitar while the neighbors wander by; he’s gone inside where there’s AC, to watch reality TV and goof around on the internet. And Opie doesn’t roam Mayberry unsupervised anymore; now he’s got karate, soccer, swim team, piano lessons, and cub scouts to get to, and a Playstation waiting for him when he gets home.

I’m worried about how the fast pace of daily life might suck the idle creativity out of us all. Inspiration can’t be scheduled and the muses don’t really fancy the distracted.

I had a nice lazy day on Saturday. All the media hysteria leading into the icy morning had me predisposed to a snowday mindset and difficulty sleeping because of my sinus troubles put me into a less-than-productive mood. So, instead of hitting the ground running, I lingered over my morning tea, contemplating the ice-scape outside the window and letting my sleepy mind wander. Eventually I noticed that the light fixture over the table was reflected in the surface of my tea. It took several attempts (and a refill) to capture the image, but I’m pleased with the result. And I wonder how many other interesting images present themselves to me on days when I’m just whizzing by…


###

Bredesen smacked down

A federal judge says that Bredesen can’t just decide to cut people from TennCare without first securing changes to consent decrees, according to the Tennessean:

The ruling puts on hold — at least temporarily — the governor’s plans to overhaul the $8.7 billion TennCare program. It comes three days before Bredesen is to deliver his State of the State address, in which he will outline his state budget priorities to lawmakers.

The KnoxNews is reporting that Bredesen “will proceed as planned” in the State of the State tomorrow and will present “a new state budget that counts on TennCare cuts.” Apparently Phil has a lot of confidence in the state’s legal team.

###

Ice

Here’s some of this morning’s winter ice. I have some more photos to share, but I think I’ll spread them out a bit. It’ll be nice to have a backlog of images for a change.

The temperature is finally starting to edge its way above freezing, so what little ice we have should disappear soon. The Chattanoogan.com is reporting a few scattered power outages and some fender-benders, and that’s about it. They also have a small photo gallery with images from the morning. It doesn’t take much to get us excited about winter weather around here!


###

Phil, Phil, Phil…

I don’t know what to think about Phil Bredesen. He’s been getting tons of press lately, with a cover piece over at The New Republic. People are talking about a run for the White House in ‘08, because he’s a moderate southern democrat who might play on the national stage.

I don’t get it.

I’m involved in politics because I want the world to be a better place, not because I want to win. I understand that winning is a necessary part of effecting change, but it isn’t the final goal. What’s the point if your guy won’t change things for the better once he’s in office?

We were all excited about Phil when he was first elected. As Bubba indicates, many of us had very high hopes:

I was looking forward to responsible management of the state budget and reasonable approaches to getting spending under control, followed by a reevaluation of our priorities, educating the public on the issues and the needs, and getting to work fixing some of the serious problems in our state.

Unfortunately this has not happened. His two significant accomplishments so far are worker’s comp “reform”, which amounts to a handout for big corporations at the expense of reduced benefits for working people injured on the job, and his “reform”, i.e. dismantling, of TennCare, which will put more than 300,000 out on the street in terms of health care.

These are not the progressive reforms Tennessee Democrats are looking for.

Phil showed some promise, but before he even got out of the starting gate, he caved on tax reform and his first couple of years in the governor’s office have him looking a lot like just another republicrat. Our schools continue to languish and hundreds of thousands of people have just seen their health care coverage disappear. Even his supposedly progressive initiatives don’t stand up to scrutiny very well. In this patchwork of recent Bredesen news, there is also this tidbit:

Gov Opposes TBR Amendment
Well, the predictions were right. It turns out that Governor Phil Bredesen is not a fan of an amendment that would permanently ban a state income tax and fix state spending to growth levels of the private sector. Bredesen also said he wouldn’t actively oppose an amendment banning gay marriage, even though he didn’t think it was necessary [...].

Maybe the TBR thing is just an attempt to keep us progressives on board by tossing us a bone, but actions speak much louder than words. Opposing a ban on a state income tax is lip service. Actually enacting tax reform is something else entirely, and we’re still waiting on some move in that direction. And finally, his lame response to the right-wing’s attempt to write discrimination into our state constitution is sheer cowardice.

Bottom line, I’m still waiting for some reason to even get excited about Phil’s reelection campaign in ‘06, much less a national campaign in ‘08.

###

Saturday morning meme

Heh. No breaking news here.

Paul KrugmanYou are Paul Krugman! You’re a brilliant economist with a knack for both making sense of the current economic situation and exposing the Bush administration’s lies about it. You somehow came out as the best anti-war writer on the Op-Ed staff. Other economists hate your guts for selling out to the liberals. To hell with ‘em.

Which New York Times Op-Ed Columnist Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla

I was up awfully early today, especially for a Saturday. My sinuses are all upset about the changes in weather, so I haven’t been sleeping well for the past few nights. The sunrise has been very slow and muted this morning. The cloud cover is dense and we’re still getting a bit of freezing rain, which is coating the trees and grass in a layer of ice. Hopefully it hasn’t been cold long enough for the roads to be all that slick — my car is covered in ice, but there’s a puddle of water on my driveway, so except for the bridges, we might be ok. As long as the trees don’t give way under the weight of the ice, this winter event should give us a picturesque morning without disrupting our weekend much. I’ll post a photo in a bit — at the moment, I’m holding out for better light.

Oh, since I started this out with the columnist meme, here’s a link for you: Krugman archive. What better way to spend a cold and dreary Saturday than catching up with your favorite progressive economist? ;-)

###

How do you spell schadenfreude?

Ann Coulter totally got smacked down by a Canadian news correspondent Wednesday night.

Coulter: “Canada used to be one of our most loyal friends and vice-versa. I mean Canada sent troops to Vietnam – was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?”
McKeown interrupts: “Canada didn’t send troops to Vietnam.”
Coulter: “I don’t think that’s right.”
McKeown: “Canada did not send troops to Vietnam.”
Coulter (looking desperate): “Indochina?”
McKeown: “Uh no. Canada …second World War of course. Korea. Yes. Vietnam No.”
Coulter: “I think you’re wrong.”
McKeown: “No, took a pass on Vietnam.”
Coulter: “I think you’re wrong.”
McKeown: “No, Australia was there, not Canada.”
Coulter: “I think Canada sent troops.”
McKeown: “No.”
Coulter: “Well. I’ll get back to you on that.”

McKeown tags out in script:
“Coulter never got back to us — but for the record, like Iraq, Canada sent no troops to Vietnam.”

That’ll teach Coulter to appear on a TV station that doesn’t script its “debates.” (via Will Pitt)

UPDATE: Turns out, Ann’s jumped the shark. Who knew? She barely made it onto the 50 Most Loathsome People in America list:

Coulter plummets down the list as she slips into irrelevance. As her columns degenerate further into absurd, incoherent attacks against her own personal paranoid fantasy of fanged, drooling, Saddam-loving liberals who hate America and childish France-bashing, we find our outrage slowly giving way to a baffled “I can’t believe I used to go out with you” feeling. Her arguments are ridiculous, her vitriol forced, her hatchet face even harder to look at. Still, she insulted a one-armed war veteran, called reports of the hundreds of tons of missing munitions in Iraq false, claimed Wesley Clark was pro-infanticide, and blamed Abu Ghraib on the presence of women in the armed forces–they’re not all like you, Ann–and on and on. It’s just not worth debunking someone who has no credibility in the first place.

I can’t argue with that. But, to whom will we now turn for incoherent, vitriolic entertainment? Michelle Malkin?

UPDATE: See the video of Ann’s performance! Crooks and Liars has the video (via Aravosis at AMERICAblog).

###

And another one gone, and another one gone

McManus makes three.

One day after President Bush ordered his Cabinet secretaries to stop hiring commentators to help promote administration initiatives, and one day after the second high-profile conservative pundit was found to be on the federal payroll, a third embarrassing hire has emerged. Salon has confirmed that Michael McManus, a marriage advocate whose syndicated column, “Ethics & Religion,” appears in 50 newspapers, was hired as a subcontractor by the Department of Health and Human Services to foster a Bush-approved marriage initiative. McManus championed the plan in his columns without disclosing to readers he was being paid to help it succeed.

The slezoid actually brought his dog and pony show here to Chattavegas:

McManus provided training during two-day conferences in Chattanooga, Tenn., and also made presentations at HHS-sponsored conferences. His syndicated column has appeared in such papers as the Washington Times, the Dallas Morning News and the Charlotte Observer.

And he’s apparently the guy behind marriagesavers. Perhaps I’m a jaded cynic, but I think this guy screams scandal. In another couple of months, he’ll be in the papers again, but it’ll be because his wife is leaving him after he’s caught in a strip club with some fishnets around his ankles or something. Or maybe not. I don’t know why I don’t believe in these pious, holier-than-thou pseudo-preacher types, but I don’t.

###

Friday Creature

Gosh! I blew out of the house in such a hurry this morning, I forgot all about posting a picture until smijer’s cats reminded me a few minutes ago. Fortunately, I have a photo ready, leftover from the trip up to Rugby a couple of weekends ago. This turkey was hanging out with the Mennonites in Muddy Pond, along with a bunch of chickens that live in an old school bus. He’s quite the impressive bird! (While the link goes to an entry for the wild turkey, I suspect this is the domestic variety.)

As always, don’t forget the other critters on the ark!

We’re expecting a snow/ice/rain/sleet mix this evening and into tomorrow… I’ll keep you posted…

Have a good weekend!

UPDATE: There’s a nice series of bird photos from Austin Country Limits here, here and here.

###

Gonzales

The fact that he’s even got a shot at the AG job just shows how horribly derailed things have become in Washington. Republicans are no longer even trying to lay claim to the label “compassionate conservatism” because even the most cynical amongst them can no longer say it with a straight face. America has become a cold, heartless beast, controlled by wretched people who are asking to make Gonzales their emblem. If one were to choose an icon to represent the values of the party that’s running this country at the moment, it would have to be this dreadfully pathetic image. It represents one of our greatest shames as a nation, and more than anyone else, we have Alberto Gonzales to thank for that. Confirmation? No, no, no. A thousand times no.

Other voices: here or here

###